UX Research · Conversion Design · Behavioural Analytics

1 in 3 orders online. A website that explained why.

Bianco's Pizzeria had loyal customers, strong Google traffic, and a website quietly working against ordering. This is the process of finding out why — and what changed.

ClientBianco's Pizzeria, Walpole MA
RoleFreelance UX Designer & Researcher
ToolsHotjar · Microsoft Clarity · Tilda CMS
StatusOngoing — Phase 2
Mobile heatmap — legacy site

Dots scattered across the screen. No clear path. No obvious next step.

This is 30 days of real user taps on the Bianco's homepage. Now imagine it's 6pm, the kids are hungry, you've decided on pizza. You land here. Every second of confusion is a lost order.

1 in 3
orders placed online. The rest by phone.
75%
of sessions on mobile — where the experience was worst.
more taps on the food menu than the ordering button.
01 — The Business

Strong product. Loyal customers. A website in the way.

Bianco's is an independent, woman-owned thin-crust pizzeria in Walpole, MA. They run their own delivery drivers — a deliberate choice to stay off Uber Eats and DoorDash and protect their staff. The product is excellent. The local reputation is strong.

The problem wasn't awareness. Most orders still came in by phone, creating operational load and removing visibility into customer behaviour. The ask: find out what's blocking online ordering, reduce the friction, shift the balance.

Who lands on this site

75% mobile. 65% arriving via Google search — the referrer data from Hotjar's traffic channel report. Search traffic indicates active intent: someone looking for a place to order, not browsing passively. The site needs to confirm the decision and get out of the way.

02 — What the Data Showed

The ordering button ranked third on its own homepage.

One month of behavioural data, August 2025, 100% session capture via Hotjar and Clarity. The top-line numbers looked fine. The click data told a different story.

The homepage had two buttons side by side: OUR MENU and ORDER NOW. OUR MENU got nearly twice the taps — 19% of all site-wide clicks versus 10% for ORDER NOW. Then there was the mobile hamburger: 27% of all taps. Open it, and the first option is the food menu. A two-tap route to the same dead end.

Why users tapped the logo and background

The hero image filled 100% of the mobile viewport with no visible scroll affordance. Users tapping the logo or background weren't lost — they were trying to activate the page, expecting a carousel or more content to appear. A full-bleed hero that hides everything below it is a design failure, not a user failure.

19%
taps on OUR MENU hero button
10%
taps on ORDER NOW — the only path to Speedline
27%
taps on hamburger → led to food menu in overlay
2.9%
taps on pizza specials — images and text combined

Clarity session recordings confirmed the pattern. Users tapped OUR MENU, landed on a wall of text with no photos and no way to order, scrolled, got stuck, and navigated back. The phone number was static — users tapping it expecting a dialer got nothing. Contact info sat below a fold most sessions never reached.

Two additional friction points compounded this. A chat-style bubble in the corner — styled to look like a messaging widget — offered “Call” and “Order” on tap. It received 28 interactions, almost all from confused users. A cookie consent banner appeared on every desktop session. Both have since been removed.

Legacy homepage heatmap
Legacy heatmap — Aug 2025. No dominant path toward ordering.
Legacy all sessions analytics
Aug 2025 baseline. 444 sessions, 5:45 avg duration. Aggregate looks acceptable. Behaviour doesn't.
03 — User Research

Three participants. One thing none of them were asked about.

Unmoderated study via Hotjar. Two scenarios: browse naturally, then attempt a specific order. No prompts on food photography. No leading questions.

S
“OOOHH PICTURES. Definitely makes me want to buy more.”
Shosh — excited by homepage photos; visibly deflated when the food menu had none
A
“When I was browsing the menu, I just saw a ton of text — with food, I usually expect to see an image.”
Abby — also asked for item ratings and “highly ordered today” signals to speed up decisions
W
“The Order Now button could be right there so I can order while I’m looking at the menu.”
Wilson — found no way to start ordering from within the food menu
Strongest finding in the project

All three participants mentioned missing food photography without being prompted. Three strangers, one session each, same observation. When that happens it stops being an assumption. It's a finding.

Shosh also found a bug on Speedline — the third-party ordering platform — where switching from delivery to pickup erased all entered address data. Outside direct control, but documented: friction at the handoff costs orders the website already earned.

Speedline ordering platform
Speedline — the ordering platform. Placeholder boxes where photos should be. Long undifferentiated list. No social proof. A second layer of friction outside direct control.
04 — The Two Paths

Same homepage. Same first tap. Very different outcomes.

The legacy site presented a fork users didn't know was a fork. Reaching for the food menu was the natural first move — see what's available before ordering. That path was a dead end. The ordering path existed but ranked third. Mobile perspective, where 75% of sessions happened.

Legacy mobile experience — pre-redesign
Path A — majority of sessions
Homepage → Food Menu → Dead end
Arrive via Google search
65% of all traffic, active intent
Full-viewport hero — no scroll signal
Some tap logo or background to activate the page
Tap OUR MENU or open hamburger → food menu link
Combined food-menu intent dominated all other actions
Static text page — no photos, no ordering path
Underlined headers look like links. Tapping: nothing.
Scroll, stall, navigate back
Loop visible across multiple Clarity recordings
✕ No path to ordering from here
Path B — fewer sessions
Homepage → Order Now → Speedline
Arrive via Google search
Same entry point
Full-viewport hero
Same context, different tap
Tap ORDER NOW — 10% of all taps
Ranked third on the page
Redirect to Speedline — separate domain
Analytics visibility ends at this step
Text list, no photos, address wipe bug
Friction continues at the handoff
✓ Order possible — friction remains
The insight

Users weren't avoiding ordering. They wanted to see the food first — a natural step before committing. The site treated that instinct as a detour. The fix wasn't removing the food menu path. It was making both paths lead to the same place: Speedline, which functions as both a browsable menu and an ordering system simultaneously.

05 — What Changed

Every decision traceable. Nothing cosmetic.

Same Tilda CMS, no platform rebuild. Each change is grounded in a specific finding.

Before
What changed
Before and after comparison — mobile
Mobile — before (top) and after (bottom). Left to right: hero, specials section, contact & location.
What changedWhy
Two equal CTAs → single “Start Order”OUR MENU got twice the taps of ORDER NOW. Eliminating the split removes the dead-end path. “Start Order” over “Order Now” — implies browsing is welcome, not that you must commit immediately.
Phone number → click-to-callClarity recordings confirmed users tapping static phone text expecting a native dialer. Nothing happened.
Anonymous pizza grid → named, clickable specialsAll three study participants independently cited missing food photography. Named items give first-time visitors a visual anchor before clicking through.
Business info → above the foldLocation, phone, and delivery area were hidden below a full-viewport hero with no scroll affordance. Moved above it.
CTA repeated mid-pageScroll depth data showed 50%+ of sessions reaching mid-page. The CTA needs to be there to meet them.
Cookie banner removedNo legal requirement for a US-only local audience. Removed friction and cleaned up data capture.
Chat-style bubble removed28 taps, almost all from confused users. Engagement driven by wrong affordance is not positive engagement.
06 — Early Results

The signals that matter. And the one still missing.

January 6 to March 4, 2026. Hotjar on free tier — 35% sampling. Session counts are estimates; ratios and behavioural patterns are valid. Clarity running at 100% capture throughout.

Returning sessions: 13.1% → 29.6%Returning sessions doubled after the redesign. In analytics terms, this means the browser recognised a prior visit — a proxy for users coming back to order again. It's the clearest available signal that the experience improved.
MetricAug 2025Jan–Mar 2026
Returning sessions13.1%29.6%↑ Doubled
Session duration5:456:03↑ Positive
Homepage scroll depth49.8%53.4%↑ More users reaching mid-page CTA
Rage clicks20↑ Friction resolved
Bounce rate27.3%41.7%Measurement artifact — see below
Why the bounce rate went up — and why that's expected

On the legacy site, tapping OUR MENU created a second pageview — analytics recorded that as engagement, artificially lowering the bounce rate. After the redesign, a user who lands, taps Start Order, and goes straight to Speedline is a single-page visit. It reads as a bounce even when the intended action was completed. Clarity recordings validate this: sessions showing users reaching Speedline are false negatives in the bounce count, not failures.

Still open — highest priority

The “Menu” navigation item is still the #1 clicked element post-redesign at 622 sessions — and still routes to the static text page. Redirecting it to Speedline is the next action. Until it ships, a significant share of engaged sessions is hitting a dead end.

How the redirect will be evaluated once it ships
Evaluation framework
Did “Menu” drop from Top Pages? Yes: redirect confirmed. No: check if old URL is still indexed or linked externally.
Did bounce rate rise further? Check Clarity recordings. Users reaching Speedline = false negative. Users immediately exiting = Speedline UX problem.
Did combined “Menu” + “Start Order” clicks rise as % of sessions? Yes: conversion proxy improving. No: consider removing the Menu nav item entirely.

The structural constraint throughout: Hotjar and Clarity stop recording the moment a user leaves for Speedline. Whether a visit became an order is invisible. Every metric above is a proxy. A UTM passthrough inquiry to Speedline is pending — if supported, it would allow website-originated sessions to be identified within Speedline's reporting.

07 — What’s Next

Friction removed. Foundation to build on.

Immediate: redirect the food menu to Speedline, track Start Order as a conversion event, establish a 30-day clean data window. Then: CTA language rotation, a user test of the current experience, and a formal site map.

Longer term, there's a brand story that hasn't been told yet. Long-tenured kitchen staff. Their own delivery drivers. A deliberate choice not to join Uber Eats — made to protect livelihoods, not just margins. A content strategy rooted in that story, paired with SEO work and a marketing calendar, is the difference between a fixed website and a growing business.

08 — Reflection

The reasoning is the work.

The most important calls in this project weren't design decisions. They were interpretation calls — what the scattered tap data meant, why the bounce rate increase was a good sign, why the food menu needed to be understood as user intent before it could be treated as a design problem.

Working within a free-tier toolset, a third-party platform that couldn't be modified, and incomplete conversion data: that's what this engagement actually looked like. Navigating that clearly is the skill.

On AI in this project: The legacy audit and problem identification came before any AI tools were introduced. Claude was used to synthesise the volume of behavioural data across Hotjar and Clarity, maintain a living project document, and build this case study page. The goal: more time on the judgment that requires a designer, less on work that doesn't.